Viewing problems? Click here.

Chatham Citizens for Effective Communities
 

A monthly e-newsletter

April 2011
Volume 1, Issue 5
Special Edition


In this issue:

Earth Day Remembered

"Let's Get Fracking"

WARNING: Fracking Can Be Dangerous To Our Health

A Bridge to Nowhere

FRAC Act Introduced on Capitol Hill



Earth Day Remembered

On April 22, 2011, the 41st edition of "Earth Day" came and went. Truth is, it wasn't much of an attention grabber for the nearly 7 billion human children of Mother Earth busily engaged in the business of thriving -- or merely surviving -- yet one more day. But the truth also is that given the status of the planet, we need to remember that every day must be Earth Day.

Given the current condition and emerging trends, people around the whole earth must pay attention to the forces that create and sustain the gift of life on this planet that is unique in the entire known universe. We are called upon as never before to show due respect to the life-giving, nurturing forces of nature and to the world’s natural resources entrusted to us to manage as wise and selfless stewards. The resources are not endless and our time is finite. Therefore, take care to do no harm to the source and nourishment of your being. Remember to walk softly and leave no tracks.

Twenty-one years after he worked with Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin to create the first Earth Day, John Heritage recently wrote: “The human species has now taken dominion over the entire planet. Earth’s well-being is now our responsibility. In turn, our fate depends on the condition of Earth. Rules alone can’t save the planet. Human beings acting in concert, with barriers down and differences healed, might be able to do it.”

May Earth Day kindle a spark of death-defying hope needed to preserve Mother Earth as we know her.

Back to top


“Let’s Get Fracking!”

It’s a cry now being heard across the state from politicians on Jones Street to citizens on Main Street and applauded by the entire gas drilling industry. It’s a call to grab hold of that low hanging fruit (shale gas) just beneath our feet and reap the harvest. It’s an invitation to partake in a monetary feast to be spread out among the State, land owners and energy moguls alike. It’s perceived as Mother Nature’s gift to us, a Cornucopia to shore up sagging revenues, bolster individual bank accounts and boost business profits. But that’s not all; it also comes with the promise (or premise?) of being a home grown (no foreign fingers in the pot), clean (less CO2 and grimy stuff), safe (think Fukushima reactors) bridge to an alternative energy future. And how about all those jobs it will create for our local truck drivers, bulldozers and well sinkers. What’s not to love? Let’s git ‘er done! Let’s get fracking!

And so, the great NC “Gas Rush” of 2011 begins with high hopes and great expectations by many as a partial panacea for our economic and energy woes. But just as politicians, land owners and gas executives hurriedly line up to find their place in the parade, others of a more questioning and wary nature step in line. Their caution is perceived as dark clouds looming on the horizon. Will they bring rain to delay or cancel the parade? Will they ruin a good time with a down pouring of doubts? Will they just dry up and blow away? Doesn’t everyone love a parade?

Like most “hot button” issues facing a diverse society and divided populace, the extraction of natural gas through the process of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) tends to draw a line in the sand (or shale in this case). The resulting “tug-of-war” sets up a contest to recruit and persuade people to throw the weight of their knowledge and convictions into the tussle. Helping folks to understand the pros and cons, assets and liabilities, and the potential for help or harm based on factual study and documented information is critical in the fracking debate. It is important to straddle the line, look in both directions, gather facts and filter misinformation in preparing to choose which direction to pull.

As an education and advocacy organization, the fracking issue has been on CCEC’s radar screen for many months. We’ve looked in both directions, listened and learned and discerned. Now, with the local activity of gas drilling companies to secure leases for mineral rights, and the move afoot in the NC General Assembly to remove fracking prohibitions, we believe it is time to be proactive. With this in mind, and upon CCEC’s invitation, a dozen folks representing ten organizations gathered on April 20 for a brain-storming session. Together they began to lay the foundation for an alliance of groups and individuals to address the issue of natural gas extraction via fracking in Chatham and NC.

In the coming weeks and months CCEC will continue to collaborate with this core group, and we look forward to sharing emerging plans for citizen education and advocacy as together we get cracking on this critical and controversial issue of fracking.

Back to top


WARNING! Fracking Can Be Dangerous To Our Health

Question: Would you swallow a bottle of “magic pills” just because a pill salesman told you that you need them, that they will be good for you (boost your energy), that your purchase will help the economy, that it will create jobs, that you will be paid to take the first bottle and that you’ll even get a cut of the sales profits? Hmmm, that does sound tempting.

Would you do it even if you didn’t know what was in those pills and there was no disclosure of potential health risks on the bottle? Perhaps you’d ask the salesman to tell you what is in the pills? What if he told you, “It’s none of your business what’s in my pills; that’s a trade secret protected by law.” What if, in spite of the unreasonableness of this scenario, you took the pills, passed them around to all your family and neighbors? What if many got sick and some died? What if you reported it to the pill company, and they claimed no responsibility? Would you feel like you had been snookered? Would you be ticked off … outraged?

There’s a salesman in our neighborhoods right now with a deal every bit as preposterous and lethal as that of the ubiquitous pill pusher, but just as tempting. He’s betting that P.T Barmun was correct (“a sucker born every minute”), and that the government of the state of North Carolina will help him promote his business. It’s worked in 34 other states across the country, and the climate in NC is getting friendlier all the time. His “oh-so-tempting” sugar coated poison pill appears in the form of “shale gas,” and it’s the traumatic water-wasting, toxin-lased horizontal drilling method of extracting the gas from underground shale deposits that’s the killer.

Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” for short, pumps a noxious chemical cocktail combined with massive volumes of water deep underground to fracture shale containing pockets of natural (shale) gas. This horizontal drilling method and injection of chemicals is currently banned by law in NC, and for good reason. The cost in community degradation, human suffering and the pollution of subsurface and surface waters as well as land and air is documented in states where the ill conceived practice is allowed with little or no regulation or enforcement measures required.

As NC legislators explore ways to cure our economic ills, some are swallowing the pitch from the “magic pill” (natural gas drilling) salesman. As a result, while New York has imposed a moratorium on fracking, our longstanding law prohibiting fracking is in grave danger of being deep sixed under the lure of an alleged “clean” and relatively cheap home grown alternative energy source and economic booster. And in our own back yards (forests, fields and rivers) of Chatham and Lee counties, gas drilling companies are already successfully offering speculative predatory deeds to landowners for rights to drill for shale gas, betting that the laws will soon be on their side. With little or no information on the horrific consequences of their actions, people are swallowing the poison pill as though it were good medicine for all.

There is already plenty of hype about the perceived benefits of natural gas and promotion of it. More public education about the downsides of fracking as it is now practiced is a proper and responsible civic response. When the National Weather Service issues a Tornado Watch or Warning, it’s not a scare tactic. When the FDA requires a Warning label on your pill bottle, it’s not a scare tactic. When neighbors warn neighbors that “fracking” isn’t all the sweetness and light that it’s packaged and sold as … that it has a bitter dark side, it’s not a scare tactic. It’s public service. Good neighbors don’t let neighbors (or legislators) frack without all the facts.

As citizens come to understand the high cost of fracking to human, animal and environmental health, we are less likely to be snookered into the fantasy of harmless fracking, and are more likely to question legislation to legitimize the practice. For this reason, we believe concerned Chatham organizations and citizens should unite to wage a campaign to educate fellow citizens and advocate for no legislation that would allow fracking at the cost of human and animal health and community and environmental degradation. We’re not buying into the “Don’t Worry… Be Happy” seal of approval that seeks to reassure the public that we can trust our personal and environmental health, wellness and prosperity to the frack masters.

If you are a Chatham citizen who has concerns about fracking, wants to learn more and become actively involved, please contact us at info@chathamcitizens.org.

Back to top


A Bridge to Nowhere


We (inhabitants of planet earth and citizens of the USA) are being advised, urged and warned by most scientists and many economists that we need to transition to a renewable (sustainable) clean energy economy if modern civilization is to survive and thrive. What to do? Ta da, natural gas to the rescue. It’s home grown right here in the fertile soil (sub soil/ shale beds) of the US of A, and is the ticket, we are told, to buy us time to get from here (carbon based energy addiction) to there (some other based energy addiction).

The knee-jerk reaction of most folks, and even many thinkers with an environmentally dominant left brain, is to buy the ticket. And in the world according to mega billionaire gas geezers like T. Boone (“I'm for any fuel, as long as it's American”) Pickens, that ticket will get you a ride into the future in a natural gas powered vehicle. (See http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:H.R.1380: And there’s enough cosponsors of the “Pickens Plan” to float a battleship … or sink an oil/gas rig).

So, what’s wrong with any plan that increases the use of a “clean” real American energy source like natural gas? The problem is that natural gas is really nothing but a bridge to more natural gas, and with it more water contamination, air pollution, global warming, etc. The problem is that “natural” gas is not “clean;” it's actually quite filthy when extracted via high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking - a relatively new process now ravaging many states, most recently Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, and threatening New York. While New York is in moratorium mode trying to delay fracking as long as possible, North Carolina is racing with pedal to the metal in the opposite direction. Where are we going in such a rush?

Consider this... an independent (non-industry funded) peer-reviewed study released recently by Cornell scientist Robert Howarth, coauthored by Anthony Ingraffea and Renee Santoro, cautions that the entire process of fracking from exploration to delivery may be as bad as or worse than coal in its greenhouse gas emissions.  Even if the study was only partially correct (and the gas industry, believe it or not, claims it is purely bogus) it provides a clearer big picture of the problems fracking causes in terms of GHG emissions.

So, is replacing coal with natural gas going to “bridge” us to clean energy? Probably not, but surely every day and every dollar spent on new natural gas wells, pipelines, processing and infrastructure is a day and dollars lost in bringing us closer to wind, solar, and energy efficiency. It is taking us in the wrong direction by delaying the transition. The large-scale conversion to clean energy demands new thinking, new consumption patterns, new delivery mechanisms, new industries and new financial incentives. It’s a bigger challenge than putting men on the moon, and more critical to the survival of inhabitants of the earth.

Burning more natural gas simply puts energy from a different source into the same system now used for coal. To stabilize the climate at 350 parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere, we can’t afford to invest precious time and dollars in any infrastructure that continues to increase greenhouse gases. A natural gas burning power plant that operates for the next 50 years means five more decades of burning fossil fuel that could instead be capturing energy from efficiency, wind, sun or other sustainable sources. It’s the “while Nero fiddles … Rome burns” syndrome all over again.

We are faced with energy choices, choices that immediately impact our communities’ air and water as well as the stability of Earth’s climate. But it’s not a choice between coal and natural gas. We are facing a choice between a truly clean energy future or more of the same “business as usual.” Jennifer Krill of EARHTWORKS sums it up: “As currently pursued, natural gas is not a short, narrow, clean bridge. It’s a bridge to nowhere: one that is long, exacts very high tolls, and has no clear end.”

Back to top


FRAC Act Introduced on Capitol Hill to Close “Halliburton Loophole”:
NC Legislators Headed in Opposite Direction


While there’s a move afoot on Jones Street in Raleigh to open the now closed and locked door to horizontal hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) in NC, on Capitol Hill in D.C. a piece of legislation has been introduced to nudge the door in the other direction. If it were to defy all odds in the current Congress and get serious consideration (one can only dream), the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act (FRAC ACT) would close what is unaffectionately dubbed as the “Halliburton Loophole.” That loophole is the natural gas industry’s carte blanche to fracking frenzy.

Ever since 2005, when former V.P. (and former Halliburton Executive) Dick Cheney helped to craft and launch the so-called Halliburton loophole, oil and gas companies have been selectively exempted from customary safety measures, health safeguards, regulatory oversights, penalties and liabilities in the Clean Water Drinking Act (CWDA). This means that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is pretty well handcuffed in matters of fracking. It is worth noting that in 2001 Cheney’s “energy task force” touted the benefits of hydraulic fracturing, while redacting references to human health hazards associated with the process. So, fracking ended up with the “Don’t Worry… Be Happy” seal of approval.

For your edification, here’s how they did it:

Step 1. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended the Safe Drinking Water Act to exclude “…the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities.’’

Step 2. The Clean Water Act changed the definition of pollutant: “This TERM (Pollutant) DOES NOT MEAN (A) sewage from vessels ‘within the meaning of section 312 of this Act; or (B) water, gas, or other material which is injected into a well to facilitate production of oil or gas, or water derived in association with oil or gas production and disposed of in a well, if the well used either to facilitate production or for disposal purposes is approved by authority of the State in which the well is located, and if such State determines that such injection or disposal will not result in the degradation of ground or surface water resources.”

Bottom line, if you need to pollute natural resources (say, like water) in order to get the prize at the bottom of the Cracker Jacks box, but it’s illegal to pollute … then just change the definition of what a pollutant is. Forget that old line about a rose by any other name smelling as sweet. Nevertheless, redefining the poison cocktail of noxious chemicals shoved down Mother Nature’s throat and partially vomited back up doesn’t make it any less lethal. And legalizing the insidious process doesn’t make it morally acceptable.

There’s a whole lot of drumming and fifing these days against “Big Government” as a restrictive and punitive plague upon the landscape of private enterprise. But the fact is that a “core function” of government has always been to protect citizens’ health and our natural resources… not to turn its back, close its eyes and stick its head in the sand while the Bull has its way in the china shop. Anyone care to spend “happy hour” unwittingly sipping on a Salmonella Cocktail (or how about a glass of swill from a contaminated well or river)?

Join with other concerned citizens across America in support of the FRAC Act. Visit http://stopfrackingnow.com/.

And stay tuned for more information from CCEC and the emerging fracking alliance of concerned local organizations and citizens about legislation being introduced to the General Assembly of NC.

Back to top

 

 
Chatham Citizens for Effective Communities (CCEC) and CCEC-Institute, Inc. is a not for profit, tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Donations are tax-deductible. CCEC, Inc. is a not for profit non tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.